What Recent FDA CRLs Reveal About CMC: A Conversation With Our Global Head Of Field Development, Amy Glekas, Ph.D.
Source: Solvias
By Amy Glekas, Ph.D., Senior Director, Global Head of Field Development

The FDA's recent release of Complete Response Letters (CRLs) has given the industry valuable insight into the most common reasons drug applications fall short of approval. While every program is different, many CRLs highlight recurring CMC challenges that can be identified and addressed much earlier in development.
In this Q&A, our Global Head of Field Development, Amy Glekas, Ph.D., discusses the key lessons developers can learn from recent CRLs and shares practical strategies for strengthening regulatory submissions, including:
- Why CMC deficiencies remain one of the leading causes of FDA Complete Response Letters
- Common development gaps that can delay approval
- How analytical and CMC planning can help reduce regulatory risk
- The value of cross-functional collaboration throughout drug development
- Practical steps for building more regulatory-ready submissions
access the Q&A!
Log In
Get unlimited access to:
Trend and Thought Leadership Articles
Case Studies & White Papers
Extensive Product Database
Members-Only Premium Content
Welcome Back! Please Log In to Continue.
X
Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Cell & Gene? Subscribe today.
Subscribe to Cell & Gene
X
Subscribe to Cell & Gene